Eiseman-Renyard and others v the United Kingdom
2019 court case from the European Court of Human Rights / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Eiseman-Renyard and others v. the United Kingdom?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
Eiseman-Renyard and others v the United Kingdom is a 2019 European Court of Human Rights case between Hannah Eiseman-Renyard and seven other applicants against the United Kingdom for an alleged breach of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The case revolved around the Metropolitan Police arresting the claimants prior to the wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton based on intelligence that the group intended to disrupt the wedding. The claimants argued that they had been arrested on no valid preventive basis. The Court dismissed the claim as inadmissible due to ill-founded beliefs.[1]
Eiseman-Renyard and others v the United Kingdom | |
---|---|
Submitted 8 August 2017 Decided 5 March 2019 | |
Full case name | Eiseman-Renyard and others v. the United Kingdom |
Case | 57884/17 57918/17 |
Language of proceedings | English |
Nationality of parties | British |
Ruling | |
Inadmissible | |
Court composition | |
President Aleš Pejchal | |
Judges
| |
Instruments cited | |
Article 5 |