Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago
1897 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897), was a ruling that determined the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required states to provide just compensation for seizing private property.[1]
Quick Facts Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, Argued November 6 – November 9, 1896 Decided March 1, 1897 ...
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago | |
---|---|
Argued November 6 – November 9, 1896 Decided March 1, 1897 | |
Full case name | Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago |
Citations | 166 U.S. 226 (more) 17 S. Ct. 581; 41 L. Ed. 979; 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2019 |
Case history | |
Prior | 149 Ill. 457, 37 N.E. 78 (1894) |
Holding | |
The 14th Amendment's due process clause requires that states provide fair compensation for seizing private property. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Harlan, joined by Field, Gray, Brown, Shiras, White, Peckham |
Dissent | Brewer |
Fuller took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amends. V, XIV |
Close
Wikisource has original text related to this article: