![cover image](https://wikiwandv2-19431.kxcdn.com/_next/image?url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/Strengthofselectionplot.png/640px-Strengthofselectionplot.png&w=640&q=50)
Antagonistic pleiotropy hypothesis
Proposed evolutionary explanation for senescence / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Antagonistic pleiotropy?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
The antagonistic pleiotropy hypothesis was first proposed in a 1952 paper on the evolutionary theory of ageing by Peter Medawar and developed further in a landmark paper by George C. Williams in 1957.[1] Their original hypotheses have since spurred a huge and fruitful literature on the evolutionary explanation for senescence.[2] Pleiotropy is the phenomenon where a single gene influences more than one phenotypic trait in an organism.[3][4] It is one of the most commonly observed attributes of genes.[5] A gene is considered to exhibit antagonistic pleiotropy if it controls more than one phenotypic trait, where at least one of these traits is beneficial to the organism's fitness and at least one is detrimental to fitness.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/Strengthofselectionplot.png/320px-Strengthofselectionplot.png)
This line of genetic research began as an attempt to answer the following question: if survival and reproduction should always be favoured by natural selection, why should ageing – which in evolutionary terms can be described as the age-related decline in survival rate and reproduction – be nearly ubiquitous in the natural world?"[2] The antagonistic pleiotropy hypothesis provides a partial answer to this question. As an evolutionary explanation for ageing, the hypothesis relies on the fact that reproductive capacity declines with age in many species and, therefore, the strength of natural selection also declines with age (because there can be no natural selection without reproduction).[6][7] Since the strength of selection declines over the life cycles of human and some other organisms, natural selection in these species tends to favor "alleles that have early beneficial effects, but later deleterious effects".[8]
Antagonistic pleiotropy also provides a framework for understanding why many genetic disorders, even those causing life threatening health impacts (e.g. sickle cell anaemia), are found to be relatively prevalent in populations when, seen through the lens of simple evolutionary processes, they should be observed at very low frequencies due to the force of natural selection. Genetic models of populations show that antagonistic pleiotropy allows genetic disorders to be maintained at reasonably high frequencies "even if the fitness benefits are subtle".[9] In this sense, antagonistic pleiotropy forms the basis of a "genetic trade-off between different fitness components."[10]