Talk:Military aircraft
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As briefly discussed in Talk:Military_aircraft_list the large list in that article has been broken down across several categories, [Military aircraft list] currently redirects to Military aircraft.
Hello, I'm a french wikipedian and I don't understand why exists on the wikipedia (free community) a link having a relationship with a play Micro$oft (Flight Simulator) whereas Micro$oft is against the Free community. Could somebody explain me? Thanks
- it is arguable today that Microsoft is entirely "against" the free community; it has open sourced some of its software, sometimes using sourceforge. in any case, microsoft's business principles do not concern us here. this is an encyclopedia intended to provide helpful, accurate information, and that goal overrides any personal objections we have regarding the external sites to which we link. ✈ James C. 07:01, 2004 Jul 27 (UTC)
- Escuse me for the delay, you are right, that doesn't concern us, but I wonder if this link is encyclopedic. I think, it isn't indispensable. Escuse me for my english, I'm bad.
- I agree, I don't see how a link to a game site can be appropriate where I added a link yesterday to airfighters.com where people can view photos of the real thing and it got removed. This is the Military Aircraft page and not the Military Aircraft Games page, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PhantomPhanII (talk • contribs) 14:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Escuse me for the delay, you are right, that doesn't concern us, but I wonder if this link is encyclopedic. I think, it isn't indispensable. Escuse me for my english, I'm bad.
More information This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:, This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: ...
This level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Close