I don’t have time for it right now, but someone should add mention of Philip J. Hirschkop who "Argued the cause for the appellants pro hac vice, by special leave of Court" in Loving v. Virginia[1]. Presumably, that’s a much more significant real‐life case than the one mentioned in the article.
|
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles | | Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles | | Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
|
|
| This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
Also, if the currently mentioned case stays in, the formal name of the case should be used instead of the roundabout description currently in place: “a lawsuit against the tobacco industry filed by Marsha F. and Richard Doolittle in New Jersey in 2002.” —Patrick Garies 02:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
[1] http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_395